Did fundraising cause the recent government shutdown?
In the weeks leading up to the government shutdown, I heard some rumblings via the news media that Senator Ted Cruz and those aligned with him were dragging things out in Congress to maximize their online and direct mail fundraising efforts. To be honest, I didn’t give much thought to those accusations. They sounded like sour grapes and something partisan opponents would say in the heat of the moment. And then . . . when the government actually shut down, I started receiving a flood of email from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC). This is when my fundraising spidey-sense started to tingle, and I started paying attention because there must be lessons to be learned for non-profit organizations somewhere in this mess.
Here is what the most recent DCCC fundraising email said:
Dear Erik —
Boehner’s Tea Party majority is teetering on the edge:
A new poll shows that Democrats are leading SEVENTEEN Republican Congressmen after the Tea Party-inspired shutdown. Guess how many seats we need to win back a Democratic Majority? 17.
Voters are done putting up with the extreme Tea Party antics that have paralyzed the government. We have to act quickly to press our advantage in these crucial races. Will you help us raise $500,000 immediately to take on vulnerable House Republicans?
Donate $3 IMMEDIATELY to the Democratic Majority Rapid Response Fund.
This shutdown could spell the end of the Tea Party controlled Republican Majority.
But if we want that to happen, we have to act now.
DCCC Rapid Reponse
I purposely omitted the hyperlinks and website addresses because my intention is to evaluate language and strategy and not raise money for the DCCC.
So, let’s strip out the partisanship and set aside our personal political feelings. Let’s avoid the temptation to point fingers. Let’s just look at the circumstances, strategies and verbiage in the letter from a “Just the facts, ma’am” perspective.
What do you see? What do you sense?
Here is what I’m seeing:
- I see a misspelling in the signature block.
- I see a case for support spelled out in five simple sentences.
- I see emotionally charged words intended to poke and prod me into action (e.g. teetering, extreme, paralyzed, etc).
- I see a fundraising goal clearly articulated (e.g. $500,000).
- I see a specific ask (e.g. Donate $3.00 immediately).
- I sense the strategy here is to set a very low barrier to entry to entice first time donors. In other words, they poke me, I get upset, and the solution is as simple as just giving $3.00 to make things right again.
- I see an email with a small handful of carefully worded sentences fitting neatly on my computer screen. I don’t need to scroll down to continue reading.
- I see short easy to read sentences. The longest sentence was 16 words long.
There is so much that you can learn if you just keep your eyes, ears and mind open. Professional fundraisers cram your mailbox and email inbox full of examples every day. Are you paying attention? Because with a little discipline you can teach yourself a lot in a short period of time.
Let’s circle back to the question I pose in the headline of this blog post:
Did fundraising cause the recent government shutdown?
I think a case can be made for the answer to this question being “YES”.
There is so much noise being made in our political arena on a daily basis that many people tune things out. I know that I am as guilty as others in this regard. So, when you have fundraising goals to hit, then your case for support needs to be very big and noisy in order to get people’s attention.
I believe the lesson to be learned here for non-profit organizations is that your case for support is powerful. It is the engine at the center of your resource development plan. It is the jet fuel for all of your fundraising appeals regardless of whether it is a direct mail appeal, email, social media, telephone solicitation, face-to-face pledge drive or special event.
When crafting your case for support, this is what our friends in the political fundraising world seem to be telling their non-profit cousins:
- Make it emotional
- Focus on an issue that people care about
- Choose an issue that donors and the media will talk about and magnify
- Wrap marketing efforts around your fundraising efforts
- Where possible, infuse advocacy into the appeal
For those of you who are skeptical and find yourself thinking at the end of this blog post that non-profit organizations can’t “manufacture” a crisis and weave it into a case for support like politicians, then let me suggest that you open your mind a little more.
I cannot tell you how many agencies I’ve seen neglect their buildings by minimally investing in maintenance and upkeep. In the final analysis, aren’t those agencies just slowly creating a powerful capital campaign case for support for down the road? Maybe it is purposeful and maybe it isn’t, but the fact that it is a manufactured crisis cannot be denied.
There are plenty of needs and gaps in our communities around which non-profit organizations can build a powerful case for support. We don’t need to manufacture crisis to raise money like our political counterparts, but it does happen more often than you think.
So, what are you waiting for?
It is the fourth quarter and year-end fundraising is one of the biggest shows on Earth. Start writing your case for support document today so you can transform it into an eloquent and powerful fundraising appeal in the next few weeks.
But whatever you do, please don’t “shutdown” your agency to make a buck or two. I suspect donors can only handle this strategy in small doses. 😉
And I am making a mental note to myself . . . perhaps, I need to stop tuning out politicians on a daily basis so they stop doing drastic things to get my attention. 😉 (Sorry, I just couldn’t help myself.)
Here’s to your health!
Founder & President, The Healthy Non-Profit LLC
Posted on October 8, 2013, in Fundraising, nonprofit, resource development and tagged case for support, case statement, direct mail, ePhilanthropy, fundraising, government shutdown, nonprofit, Obamacare, resource development, solicitation, year-end fundraising, year-end giving. Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.
Erik, thank you for sharing this and for your insightful analysis. I recognize the rhetoric in the appeal. It’s emotional and it’s urgent. What they don’t tell us is how more money will fix the problem and I think that’s a problem. A good case for support tell the donor how the funds raised will be used. When the dots — between the problem, the solution and how funds will help bring about the solution — are not connected, I become suspicious.
Hey Febe! Great hearing from you. Your observation is more than right on target. It is a bullseye. Of course, we may be overlooking the obvious. The writer might be assuming that donors KNOW that nothing they do or donate will “fix” the problem and any attempt at trying to spin that reality might look comical. On a less cynical note, they do insinuate in the letter that the “fix” resides in removing 17 Republican congressmen who are under water in the polls. The implication is that your money will target those races and a Democratic majority will stop things like government shutdowns.
I dunno. I don’t really want to go there. Let’s stick with your awesome point about case for support documents as they relate to NFPs.
When it comes to non-profit fundraising appeals, you are 100% right that the case for support MUST clearly and emotionally articulate a problem and a solution. It also must clearly explain how your contribution is necessary to bringing about the solution.
Thanks as always for weighing in. You’re super smart and I always appreciate your insights and suggestions.
Yes, agreed, let’s stick to the case for support as it relates to NFPs. That’s far more comfortable territory for me. Having said that I spend many years working in public affairs for government. It was exciting work. f
Pingback: More on the government shutdown and the non-profit sector | Donor Dreams Blog